2
Before
![]()
After
![]()
After
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
2
I didn't groove mine as far as Lamont did. I only went half way. I figured that I would get better traction and water displacement. It works better than it did before. I don't ride in the rain much though. Only when I get caught in it. :x
Hoss
![]()
Hoss
Hoss,
By the looks of the rust on that rear rotor, you haven't been out since Daytona!!......
By the looks of the rust on that rear rotor, you haven't been out since Daytona!!......
That wasn't my tire it was just one I found some pictures of, I run a car tire.
Thanks EVERYONE! I've never "grooved" a tire before, I don't like the idea that the tire designed and recomended for the Boss has to be modified (grooved) in order to be safe of wet roads! My 250 is not great on wet roads BUT it sounds better then the 230 :?
I ended up getting my own stock wheels back from dealer and the stock tires are still mounted (brand new). I figure instead on wasting the rubber I would just use them and have some fun with the 230 Once the 230 is gone I will mount a car tire on the wheel (they squeel so much better then the AVON does eh Lamont ) and use that set-up for "play mode" ...
PS
Thanks Tim for the offer on your rear wheel. I wanted to see if I could get my originals first.
I ended up getting my own stock wheels back from dealer and the stock tires are still mounted (brand new). I figure instead on wasting the rubber I would just use them and have some fun with the 230
Once the 230 is gone I will mount a car tire on the wheel (they squeel so much better then the AVON does eh Lamont ) and use that set-up for "play mode" ...PS
Thanks Tim for the offer on your rear wheel. I wanted to see if I could get my originals first.
Thanks Chris!Ncbosshoss said:
The picture in my signature is actually a picture of the picture! The real pic looks much better, color is more even and not as dark either. I sent e-mails and called him to ask if he could send me the picture (low resolution) through e-mail to use on website - I NEVER got an answer back from him :? As helpful as they were in person they have been just as unhelpful (if that's a real word) now ... I don't think I could recomend them for that reason alone I had planned to have some cards made through him using the photo - NOT anymore!PS
I know he gave low resolution copies of the pictures to a couple other guys ... that is why I did not see a problem to have a low resolution pic e-mailed to me.
Mark was is a rally in LA, he just got back.V-MAN said:Thanks Chris!Ncbosshoss said:
PS
I know he gave low resolution copies of the pictures to a couple other guys ... that is why I did not see a problem to have a low resolution pic e-mailed to me.
Update - The Rest Of The Story
It's certainly is not the money it's the principal and I agree!
Oh well I just wanted to post the "FULL STORY" now that I know it. I thought that would be the fair thing to do.
I talked to Kim last night about this ... apparently she did speak to Mark. She had also been trying the telephone number and leaving messages - she never got a return call BUT she did reach him one afternoon. He told her that he did e-mail me (I never got anything). He also told her that it would cost $20 - $25 to send me a "screen shot" (low resolution pic) to my e-mail. Kim did not want to pay him for the shot because she thought $200 spent in Daytona they should have included a "screen shot"V-MAN said:
It's certainly is not the money it's the principal and I agree!Oh well I just wanted to post the "FULL STORY" now that I know it. I thought that would be the fair thing to do.
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
